2 Muslims CHALLENGE Christian & End Up Getting WIPED OUT!

Many Muslim apologists claim that Christians cannot trust the Bible because it has been corrupted. A recent discussion between Central Dawah, Shaykh Uthman ibn Farooq, and a Christian brought that claim back into the spotlight.

As the conversation progressed, several familiar objections appeared. However, those objections also raised important questions about what the Quran itself says regarding the earlier Scriptures.

This discussion wasn’t just about memorizing verses. It highlighted why context, consistency, and careful handling of Scripture matter when discussing faith.

Does the Quran Tell Christians to Follow the Bible?

Early in the discussion, the Christian participant pointed to several Quranic passages that speak positively about the Torah and the Gospel.

Rather than denying these texts exist, the conversation shifted toward arguing over terminology—whether the Quran specifically mentions “the Bible.”

However, this distinction misses the larger point. The Bible consists of the very books identified throughout the Quran as the Torah, the Psalms, and the Gospel.

The issue is not whether the English word “Bible” appears in the Quran, but whether the Quran acknowledges and affirms God’s previous revelations.

The passages cited in the debate include Surah 3:3, Surah 5:48, and especially Surah 5:68, which instructs the People of the Book to stand firmly upon the Torah and the Gospel. If those Scriptures were already hopelessly corrupted, such commands would make little sense.

“Say, O People of the Scripture! Ye have nought (of guidance) till ye observe the Torah and the Gospel…” — Surah 5:68

The discussion demonstrates why definitions matter. Arguing over vocabulary can distract from what the text is actually communicating.

The Gospel Was Written, Not Merely Spoken

One of the refreshing moments during the exchange came when the Christian participant emphasized that believers should treat opponents respectfully instead of resorting to insults or personal attacks.

That attitude reflects Biblical teaching.

“But the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;” — 2 Timothy 2:24-25

Christians must defend the truth firmly without abandoning Christlike character. Winning an argument accomplishes very little if we fail to reflect the heart of Christ.

Another objection claimed that Jesus only preached the Gospel orally and that the New Testament cannot be the Gospel mentioned in the Quran.

That claim creates serious problems.

The Quran itself says that people could find Muhammad written in both the Torah and the Gospel (Surah 7:157), showing that these revelations existed in written form.

Likewise, the New Testament repeatedly teaches that Christ’s apostles faithfully recorded His words and works under the inspiration of God.

The disciples were not random authors inventing stories generations later. They were eyewitnesses and close companions commissioned by Jesus Himself.

Honest Christians Don’t Fear Difficult Questions

Scripture teaches that God worked through human authors, while preserving His perfect message.

“All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:” — 2 Timothy 3:16

“Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.” — 2 Peter 1:20-21

God used the personalities, vocabulary, experiences, and historical settings of different writers without compromising the truth of His Word.

One moment in the discussion stood out for a different reason.

When challenged with a difficult question, the Christian simply admitted he didn’t immediately know the answer and said he would research it further.

That is exactly the right response. Far too many believers feel pressured into pretending they have every answer.

Genuine humility is not weakness. It is wisdom. Share on X

I’ve said this many times myself: if someone asks you a question you cannot answer, simply admit it and study the issue. There is nothing dishonorable about learning. In fact, it demonstrates confidence that Christianity can withstand honest investigation.

Copyist Errors Do Not Destroy Biblical Inspiration

One of the objections raised involved Ahaziah’s age when he became king.

2 Kings records:

“Two and twenty years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign; and he reigned one year in Jerusalem…” — 2 Kings 8:26

Meanwhile, some manuscripts of 2 Chronicles read:

“Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign…” — 2 Chronicles 22:2

Critics often present this as a fatal contradiction.

In reality, at best, it represents an example of a copyist error in manuscript transmission, not an error in God’s original revelation.

Because God preserved thousands of Biblical manuscripts, textual scholars can identify places where later copyists accidentally introduced mistakes.

Ironically, critics rely on the very manuscript evidence that enables scholars to detect and correct these copying mistakes with remarkable confidence.

Muslim apologists often argue that any copyist error proves the Bible cannot be God’s Word. That argument creates a serious problem.

If every copying mistake invalidates divine revelation, then those making that claim must apply the same standard consistently wherever manuscript differences exist in the Quran.

Christians have never hidden textual variants. Many modern Bibles openly note them in footnotes because Christianity has nothing to fear from transparency.

Truth welcomes investigation. Share on X

Matthew and Luke’s Genealogies

Toward the end of the discussion, attention turned to one of the most common objections against the New Testament.

Matthew records Joseph’s ancestry through Jacob.

Luke records Joseph as being connected to Heli.

Rather than being contradictory, Christians have long recognized that the two genealogies serve different purposes.

Matthew presents Jesus’ legal royal lineage through Joseph, emphasizing His rightful claim to David’s throne.

Luke traces His family line through Mary, demonstrating His physical descent from David.

Matthew intentionally arranges his genealogy into three groups of fourteen generations to highlight Jesus as the promised Son of David, while Luke follows a different historical purpose.

Understanding the author’s intent removes much of the apparent difficulty.

Why Context Matters More Than Sound Bites

Many debates become confusing because verses are quoted without considering the author’s purpose, historical setting, or literary style.

Whether discussing the Quran’s references to previous revelation or the genealogies of Jesus, context consistently proves essential.

Quick objections may sound persuasive in short online clips, but careful study usually reveals that the issue is far more nuanced than critics suggest.

God's truth deserves more than surface-level investigation. Share on X

This discussion serves as a reminder that Christians should know both what they believe and why they believe it. More importantly, they should be willing to admit when they need to study further rather than pretending to have every answer.

We do not build confidence in God's Word by memorizing every possible response. We build confidence by studying Scripture and seeing it consistently withstand careful examination. Share on X

If you enjoyed this discussion, be sure to watch this related video, where another conversation explores similar objections about Christianity and the Bible in greater depth.

It expands and provides additional Biblical responses that will strengthen your confidence when discussing your faith with others.

WATCH THE VIDEO