Muslim Tries To CONFUSE English Christian & Gets EXPOSED!

One of the most common claims made during Christian-Muslim discussions is that Jesus was a Muslim. It is often accompanied by similar statements about Abraham, Moses, Noah, and the other prophets.

At first glance, the argument may sound convincing, especially when someone explains it using the word “submission.” However, when we test the claim against both the Bible and the Quran, we quickly uncover significant problems.

In a recent street debate, a Muslim preacher attempted to persuade a Christian that Jesus, His disciples, and even all the Old Testament prophets were Muslims because they submitted to God.

The conversation raised several important questions that every Christian should understand before encountering this popular argument.

What Muslims Mean When They Say “Jesus Was a Muslim” (The Trap Hidden Behind the Definition)

The discussion began with a sign declaring that Jesus was a Muslim. Naturally, the Christian questioned the statement, pointing out that Islam did not begin until the seventh century with Muhammad.

Rather than arguing historically, the Muslim preacher redefined the word “Muslim.” He claimed that the word simply means “one who submits his will to God.” From that definition, he concluded that Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and all the prophets were Muslims because they obeyed God.

At first, this sounds reasonable. After all, Christians also believe that followers of God should submit to His will. But definitions alone do not settle theological questions.

The real issue is not whether someone submits to God. The real question is: Which God are they submitting to?

This argument often relies on changing how the word “Muslim” is understood.

Most people hear the word “Muslim” and immediately think of someone who believes Muhammad is God’s final prophet, accepts the Quran as divine revelation, follows Islamic teachings, and practices the Five Pillars of Islam.

Yet after attracting attention with that familiar meaning, the definition suddenly changes to simply mean “someone who submits to God.”

The debate highlighted why this shift is misleading. If someone intends the modern Islamic understanding of “Muslim,” then Abraham, Moses, and Jesus could not have believed in Muhammad because he lived centuries after them.

If someone only intends the linguistic definition, then the slogan loses much of the significance it initially appears to carry.

One Question That Changes Everything: Are the Prophets Really the Same in Christianity and Islam?

The Christian asked a simple but revealing question. If Christians also submit to God, are Christians Muslims?

The Muslim preacher initially seemed to agree that we could call anyone who truly submits to God a Muslim. But when asked whether he would therefore consider a devoted Christian, such as the Pope, a Muslim, he immediately changed his answer.

The preacher rejected the idea because Christians believe Jesus is the Son of God. That response exposed the weakness in the original claim. If belief about Jesus determines whether someone is a Muslim, then merely submitting to God cannot be the complete definition.

The standard changed as soon as Christian doctrine entered the discussion.

Islam frequently claims that Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and the prophets all taught the same religion later revealed through Muhammad. Yet the Bible presents these prophets speaking and acting in ways that conflict with Islamic theology.

For example, Abraham encountered the LORD in visible form.

“And the LORD appeared unto him in the plains of Mamre…” — Genesis 18:1

Throughout Genesis 18, Abraham speaks directly with the LORD. This creates significant tension with Islamic theology, which rejects God appearing in visible human form.

Likewise, the Bible consistently reveals truths about God’s relationship with His people that Islam later rejects.

Jesus, The Only Begotten Son (Looking Through the Right Lens)

One of the clearest differences between Christianity and Islam concerns the identity of Jesus.

During the discussion, the Muslim preacher argued that other people are also called sons of God in Scripture, suggesting Jesus is no different.

The Bible, however, makes an important distinction.

“I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee.” — Psalm 2:7

Psalm 2 points uniquely to God’s Messiah. While believers may be described as God’s children by adoption, Jesus alone is presented as the uniquely begotten Son.

The New Testament makes this distinction even clearer.

“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son…” — John 3:16

Jesus is not merely another servant or prophet. He occupies a unique relationship with the Father that no other person shares. Share on X

One recurring theme throughout the debate was the importance of reading the Bible on its own terms.

Questions such as, “If Jesus is God, who was He praying to?” assume that Christians believe God is one person.

But Christianity has never taught that. The doctrine of the Trinity teaches that there is one God who eternally exists as Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.

Therefore, when Jesus speaks to the Father, He is not talking to Himself. He is communicating within the eternal relationship that exists between the divine Persons of the Godhead.

Instead of forcing Islamic assumptions onto the Bible, Christians should allow Scripture to explain itself.

The Torah, the Gospel, and the Quran: Testing Every Religious Claim

As the conversation progressed, the discussion shifted from Jesus to the reliability of Scripture.

The Muslim preacher claimed the Bible contains contradictions and therefore cannot be trusted. Yet this immediately raises another important question.

If the Torah and Gospel were corrupted before Muhammad, why does the Quran repeatedly direct Jews and Christians back to those very Scriptures?

The Quran says:

• The Torah was given by God.
• The Gospel was given by God.
• Jews should judge by the Torah.
• Christians should judge by the Gospel.

If those books were hopelessly corrupted, these commands become extremely difficult to explain.

The Christian response highlighted this inconsistency. Rather than identifying a different Torah or a different Gospel, the discussion exposed that the Quran repeatedly affirms the authority of the previous Scriptures while later Islamic arguments often attempt to dismiss them whenever they conflict with Islamic doctrine.

The Muslim preacher encouraged people to examine evidence before accepting any religion. Christians should wholeheartedly agree.

God never calls His people to blind faith. Scripture repeatedly encourages believers to test what they hear. Share on X

“Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.” — 1 Thessalonians 5:21

The question is whether every religious claim survives careful examination.

When Christianity and Islam make conflicting claims about Jesus, God, and Scripture, both cannot be true at the same time. Every claim must be weighed against the evidence.

A Personal Lesson From Conversations Like These

One encouraging aspect of this discussion is how much difference a single thoughtful question can make.

Many Christians assume they need extensive academic training before speaking with Muslims. Yet throughout this debate, simple questions exposed major inconsistencies in the argument being presented.

That is a reminder that apologetics is not merely about memorizing facts. It is about listening carefully, asking honest questions, and allowing contradictions to reveal themselves.

As believers grow in their knowledge of Scripture, they become more confident in responding graciously and truthfully to difficult conversations.

The claim that Jesus was a Muslim may sound persuasive when reduced to a simple dictionary definition, but it cannot withstand careful examination. The moment the discussion turns to who God is, who Jesus is, or what Scripture teaches, the similarities disappear.

The Bible presents Jesus as the unique Son of God, the promised Messiah, and the fulfillment of God’s redemptive plan. The prophets consistently point toward Him, not toward a later religious system that denies His divine identity.

If you enjoyed this study, be sure to watch the next video for another in-depth examination of Christian and Muslim dialogue.

That discussion builds on many of the same themes explored here and provides additional Biblical responses to common Islamic objections. As always, compare every claim with Scripture and let God’s Word be your final authority.

WATCH THE VIDEO